Trump campaign has withdrawn a central part of its lawsuit seeking to stop the certification of the election results in Pennsylvania, where Democrat Joe Biden beat Trump to capture the state and help win the White House.
Ahead of a Tuesday hearing in the case, Trump’s campaign on Sunday dropped the allegation that 682,479 mail-in and absentee ballots were illegally processed without its representatives watching.
The campaign’s slimmed-down lawsuit, filed in federal court on Sunday, maintains the aim of blocking Pennsylvania from certifying a victory for Biden in the state, and it maintains its claim that Democratic voters were treated more favorably than Republican voters.
On Monday, three more lawyers representing Trump’s campaign asked to withdraw from the Pennsylvania lawsuit, shaking up his legal team on the eve of a major court hearing.
The Associated Press on 7 November called the presidential contest for former vice-president Joe Biden, after determining that the remaining ballots left to be counted in Pennsylvania would not allow Trump to catch up. Trump has refused to concede defeat.
The remaining claim in the lawsuit aims to disqualify ballots cast by voters who were given an opportunity to fix mail-in ballots that were going to be disqualified on a technicality.
Trump Campaign Takes Legal Decision On Pennsylvania Election Results
The lawsuit charges that “Democratic-heavy counties” violated the law by identifying mail-in ballots before election day that had defects – such as lacking an inner “secrecy envelope” or lacking a voter’s signature on the outside envelope – so that the voter could fix it and ensure their vote would count, a moved called “curing”.
Republican-heavy counties “followed the law and did not provide a notice and cure process, disenfranchising many”, the lawsuit said.
Cliff Levine, a lawyer representing the Democratic National Committee, which is seeking to intervene, said it was not clear how many voters were given the chance to fix their ballot. But, he said, the number was minimal and certainly fewer than the margin – almost 70,000 – that separates Biden and Trump. “The numbers aren’t even close to the margin between the two candidates, not even close,” Levine said.
In any case, there is no provision in state law preventing counties from helping voters to fix a ballot that contains a technical deficiency. Levine said the lawsuit did not contain any allegation that somebody voted illegally.
“They really should be suing the counties that didn’t allow [voters] to make corrections,” Levine said. “The goal should be making sure every vote counts.”
Pennsylvania’s top election official, secretary of state Kathy Boockvar, a Democrat, responded in court on Sunday, asking the judge to dismiss the case. State courts are the proper jurisdiction for the subject, and the lawsuit contains no “plausible claim for relief on any legal theory”, the state’s lawyers wrote.
More than 2.6m mail-in ballots were reported received by counties, and no report of fraud or accuracy problems has been made by state or county election officials or prosecutors.
A key theme of Trump and his supporters has been their claim that Philadelphia – a Democratic bastion where Trump lost badly – had not allowed Trump’s campaign representatives to watch mail-in and absentee ballots processed and tabulated.
However, Republican lawyers have acknowledged in a separate federal court proceeding that they had certified observers watching mail-in ballots being processed in Philadelphia. Governor Tom Wolf’s administration has said that ballot watchers from all parties had observers throughout the process and that “any insinuation otherwise is a lie”.
The lawyers who requested to withdraw from the suit – Linda Kerns, John Scott and Douglas Bryan Hughes – did so in a court filing on Monday, adding that the campaign consented to their withdrawal.
In a brief order on Monday night, the judge hearing the case allowed Scott and Hughes to withdraw but not Kerns. Marc Scaringi, a Harrisburg-based lawyer, has joined the case and will be Trump’s lead counsel.
A federal judge in Williamsport will hear arguments on Tuesday in the lawsuit.
Scaringi on Monday asked the judge to postpone Tuesday’s hearing, saying he and a law partner “need additional time to adequately prepare”, but the request was quickly denied.
Bruce Green, a professor of legal ethics at Fordham Law School, described the campaign’s lawsuits as “borderline frivolous” and would not change the election’s outcome even if successful.
“It’s doomed to fail anyway. So, does it really make a difference if another lawyer comes in?” Green said. “I think in most people’s view, these cases are not being filed with any expectation that they’ll prevail.”
Source: The Guardian.
